For example, it doesn’t automatically give a description of what each attribute does and it does not kick in when it should do. What I don’t like so far is that the IntelliSense is not as good as what you get with Microsoft Visual Studio Express but maybe there still developing it.
At least I don’t have keep loading a browser up, refresh it and close it down again every 5 seconds.ĬoffeeCup is useful for me as I’m not a full-time or even a part-time pro web-developer. The preview screen only take a few seconds to refresh so thats pretty good. I think it should also take me to the correct css part as well although I’ve not played about with that part yet.
What I also like also is that you can click anywhere within the Preview window and it will automatically take you to the html code relevant. You can of course press a function key to load a host of browsers at choice. I’ve not played about with CoffeCup much as yet but the Preview is IE9 by default but can be altered to auto preview a different browser. The only real testing ground is the browser itself.Īdobe is working on a code editor that does this, called Brackets, but it’s at an early stage right now.
Dreamweaver’s Design View, for example, is very unreliable. I also don’t trust the “live view” in programs like this. I’ve considered it, and tried a few things like that, but didn’t like them. Have you never considered using CoffeeCup? or something similar? (Soon this will be automatic-but for now I think you can only do it with JS.) Using Chrome dev tools, for example, you can add styles and HTML in real time, and then save this to your files when you are done. Although you can do this with your browser anyway. Wouldn’t it be more time-efficent for the browser to give you a preview in real-time? On average, per website, you could be doing, say 2000 or more tests or 2000 needless mouse movements and clicks!!!Ĭombine that will closing the browser window then you could be looking at say 3000+ needless mouse clicks See the resolution provided in KB Article ID 10293 for further instructions.Don’t you find it annoying that you have to keep going to the browser and clicking Refresh everytime you change one litte bit of code? If the solutions provided above do not resolve this problem then it is possible that the transfer send and receive buffer size may be set too high.
In such situations, configuring CuteFTP Professional so that only one file at a time is transferred, may help.
Double-check to make sure that you are using the correct FTP host address. The most common cause for a socket error 10054 is the use of an invalid FTP host address.In some other situations a change to the default CuteFTP connection settings may be needed for connections to this particular remote FTP server. Socket error = #10054.Ī socket error 10054 may be the result of the remote server or some other piece of network equipment forcibly closing or resetting the connection. THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE APPLIES TO:ĭuring an FTP session, the following error is encountered:ĮRROR:> Can't read from control socket.